Cases

Direct references are possible when the client agrees, case by case, usually at a later stage of a sales conversation. We do not expose clients to outside contact without their prior consent.

Yes. The same rule that protects current clients protects you: nothing about your operation is published without your explicit permission, even if the result is good for publicity.

Our work is concentrated in four priority sectors (Agribusiness, Manufacturing, Distribution/Retail, Energy and Regulated industries). Each has its own page that explains the tax problem of that sector in technical terms, which is the most concrete way to judge the fit before a named case exists.

An SAP Tax Diagnostic of your own environment. It shows, using your own operation, how DFSpro maps and prioritizes risk, which is a much more direct test than reading another company's result.

Each case goes through an internal validation rule before it becomes public content: it is published only with the client's own confirmation of the result described, even when the company name does not appear. Anonymizing protects the client's identity, not the truth of the case, so the text describes the problem and the real change of state, not a generic marketing number.

The confirmation comes from the client who lived the result, not from an independent outside audit. It is the client's permission, on what can be said and how, that decides whether a case becomes public content.

Because a number goes into a case only when the client who got that result confirms it and allows it to be published. We prefer to describe the problem and the solution applied with care rather than publish a loose percentage without that confirmation.

What repeats across sectors is not the surface problem, it is the pattern behind it: a parallel spreadsheet, tax knowledge held by one person, or setup that did not follow a rule change. The sector pages exist to explain that pattern in the technical context of your own segment.

The published cases have a result confirmed by the client, so there is a real selection bias: this is not a picture of all of DFSpro's experience, it is a sample of what worked and was approved for publication. To judge what would happen in your own operation, the most direct way is the SAP Tax Diagnostic of your own environment, not another company's history.

Not necessarily. The published cases are a sample limited by what was approved for publication, not DFSpro's test for fit. The real test for fit is described in Is it for you?, and it is worth checking there before ruling us out because of what did not appear in a case.