Production lines in three shifts, tooling at the supplier's plant, parts on consignment at the customer's line, recalls by batch or chassis. In the automotive sector, operations create tax situations that stay under control only with design and proof in SAP.
The legal basis of each situation is an official source read on 23/10/2026. The SAP design is DFSpro's judgment, to be checked against each company's system version. No savings were measured.
01Fixed assets
Production line in three shifts: robots, presses and components as fixed assets
What weighs: A high-value asset with components of different lives, use in shifts and ICMS, PIS and Cofins credit running in parallel.
What DFSpro changes: Record per component, shift coefficient and CIAP tied to the same master record.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Carmakers and system integrators run robotic cells, presses and machining lines in two or three shifts, each asset made of parts replaced on different schedules.
Legal basis, line by line
- CPC 27 (R1), rev. 14, CVM: items 13, 43 and 51: replaceable components, depreciation by component and yearly review
- Decree 9,580/2018 (RIR): art. 323: accelerated depreciation coefficients of 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 by number of shifts
- Law 10,833/2003: art. 3, § 1, III and § 14: credit on depreciation or 1/48 on machinery
- LC 87/1996: art. 20, § 5: 48 installments and ratio of taxed outbound sales
Proof delivered
Expected against obtained by asset and by area, and reconciliation between FI-AA, G110 and G125 and the EFD Contributions.
02Special stock
Tooling at the supplier: the mold is yours, the possession is a third party's
What weighs: Molds, gauges and dies worth millions sit in the supplier's plant, and control of possession, invoice and depreciation is lost.
What DFSpro changes: Asset held by a third party with loan shipment, balance by supplier and depreciation per part produced.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Carmakers and system integrators pay for tooling and leave it at the supplier that makes the part. The tooling comes back for refurbishment, goes to another plant or is written off at the end of the model.
Legal basis, line by line
- Civil Code (Law 10,406/2002): arts. 579 to 585: loan for use, free lending of a non-fungible item, with return
- CPC 27 (R1), rev. 14, CVM: items 60 to 62: depreciation by units produced and yearly review of the method
Proof delivered
Tooling inventory by supplier reconciled with the asset record and the shipment invoices, and the month's depreciation checked against the parts recorded.
03Special stock
Subcontract processing: a part that leaves raw and returns machined
What weighs: The material stays yours while it is with the third party, and the EFD requires consumption and balance by participant.
What DFSpro changes: Stock of material supplied to the third party, subcontract order and Block K kept consistent.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Plants send castings, forgings and sheet metal for machining, heat treatment and painting at third parties, and receive the finished part.
Legal basis, line by line
- SAP Help, Managing Special Stocks (MM-IM), R/3 4.6C page: stock of material supplied to the subcontractor stays with the company
- EFD-ICMS/IPI Practical Guide, version 3.2.1 (updated 28/10/2025): K250 and K255 (processing by third parties) and K200 (stock by participant)
Proof delivered
Reconciliation of order, invoice and K255 by period, with a list of differences.
04Special stock
Consignment and stock at the customer's line: invoice only when the part is used
What weighs: The part stays in the customer's stock and is sold only on consumption, and the tax team must follow each step with no invoice for each movement.
What DFSpro changes: Consignment stock by customer, consumption calculation and sales invoice checked.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
System integrators keep parts stock at the carmaker's line, and dealers and distributors keep replacement stock on consignment, with periodic settlement.
Legal basis, line by line
- Civil Code (Law 10,406/2002): arts. 534 and 535: consignment contract, sale by the consignee and return within the term
- SAP Help, Managing Special Stocks (MM-IM), R/3 4.6C page: consignment listed among the types of special stock
Proof delivered
Report of consigned balance by customer reconciled with the customer's acceptance and the invoices, and partial settlement scenarios.
05Traceability
Batch, serial number and chassis: recall by traceability, not by spreadsheet
What weighs: A defect requires finding all the vehicles or batches affected, with customer, invoice and date, and reversing the tax effect of the exchange.
What DFSpro changes: Batch and serial number as document data, from the supplier to the end customer.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Auto parts makers and carmakers trace components by the supplier's batch and the product's serial number or chassis. A recall requires cross-checking who received the batch.
Legal basis, line by line
- Consumer Code (Law 8,078/1990): art. 10, § 1: immediately report a danger discovered after the sale
Proof delivered
Simulation in a test environment with a list of those affected by batch and serial number, without measuring time before running it for real.
06Credits
Auto parts exports: accumulated PIS and Cofins credit and refund
What weighs: A company that exports accumulates credit, and the refund requires a trail from the credit to the outbound document.
What DFSpro changes: Report that links credit, outbound document and the refund or offset request.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Suppliers that export parts to carmakers abroad accumulate a PIS and Cofins balance because the foreign sale creates no debit.
Legal basis, line by line
- Law 10,833/2003: art. 6, §§ 1 and 2: deduction, offset and cash refund
- Law 9,430/1996: art. 74: offset
- LC 214/2025: art. 378: credit balance kept in the transition if registered
Proof delivered
Reconciliation of the balance with the outbound documents and the bookkeeping, with a list of exceptions by document.
07Production
Product structure with thousands of items: from the bill of materials to Block K
What weighs: Each vehicle or assembly has a multilevel structure, and an engineering change alters consumption, cost and bookkeeping.
What DFSpro changes: Product structure in force by date, reconciled with the Block K record.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Carmakers and system integrators keep structures with thousands of components, with versions by date and by model, and produce in high-volume orders.
Legal basis, line by line
- EFD-ICMS/IPI Practical Guide, version 3.2.1 (updated 28/10/2025): K200, K230, K235 (inputs consumed), K250, K255 and K280 (correction of an entry)
Proof delivered
Test close that reconciles K200 with stock and K230 and K235 with the orders, with a list of differences.
08Fixed assets
Spare parts and tooling maintenance: capitalize or expense
What weighs: The same part can be an expense, a component of the asset or stock, and each choice changes depreciation and credit.
What DFSpro changes: Classification rule by type of spending, with the tax effect already defined.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Heavy lines wear out molds, rollers and tools in long cycles, with overhauls that renew whole parts of the asset.
Legal basis, line by line
- CPC 27 (R1), rev. 14, CVM: items 13 and 43: regular replacement of parts and depreciation by component
Proof delivered
Matrix with each type of spending, the expected classification and the posting obtained.
09Fixed assets
Test fleet and demo vehicles: selling used without losing credit
What weighs: Test vehicles and machines go into fixed assets, depreciate and are sold before the credit ends.
What DFSpro changes: Write-off routine that reads installments still to take, gain or loss and the transition rule.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Carmakers and system integrators keep prototypes, demo vehicles and validation machines and sell them later.
Legal basis, line by line
- LC 87/1996: art. 20, § 5, V: no credit for the remaining part after a sale in under four years
- LC 214/2025: art. 380, § 3 and art. 406, §§ 4 to 6: end of installments on disposal and transition rule for the sale of used goods
- CPC 27 (R1), rev. 14, CVM: item 67: write-off on disposal
Proof delivered
Write-off matrix by asset age with gain or loss, installment closed and G125 record expected and obtained.
10Reform
Parts stock with single-stage taxation and ST at the switch to CBS
What weighs: The 31/12/2026 stock of parts under concentrated taxation may generate a presumed credit, and must be proven by item.
What DFSpro changes: Cut-off inventory by item with the art. 381 case marked by the client.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Distributors and producers of auto parts hold significant stock of items under concentrated PIS and Cofins taxation and ICMS ST.
Legal basis, line by line
- LC 214/2025: art. 381, II: goods in stock subject to ST or single-stage taxation on purchase, including Law 10,485
Proof delivered
Cut-off inventory reconciled with K200 and Block H, with each item marked by case.
11Accounting and tax
Book and tax depreciation of the industrial park: the reconciliation that closes the year
What weighs: Book useful life and tax rate differ, and the difference must be traced asset by asset up to the tax return.
What DFSpro changes: Difference report by asset and by year, linked to controllership.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
An industrial park with thousands of assets depreciated under different rules in the book and tax views.
Legal basis, line by line
- Decree 9,580/2018 (RIR): art. 320, §§ 1 and 3: rate by period of use, adequate share with proof, set with no specification
- CPC 27 (R1), rev. 14, CVM: item 51: yearly review
Proof delivered
Report by asset checked against the asset record and the accounts, with expected and obtained values in review scenarios.
12Migration
From ECC to S/4HANA: fixed assets, external tooling and CIAP in progress
What weighs: An asset held by third parties, credit installments and balances must reach the new system without losing their history.
What DFSpro changes: Reconciled load of assets, external location and installments, before and after go-live.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Groups in the sector migrate SAP with a large asset base, external tooling and credits in progress.
Legal basis, line by line
- LC 87/1996: art. 20, § 5: installments and cancellation in the 48th month
- LC 214/2025: art. 380: installments continue as presumed CBS credit
Proof delivered
Reconciliation by asset and by area between source and target, and a report of installments to take in the first close.
13Reform
Automotive regime: presumed CBS credit calculated per approved project
What weighs: The IPI benefit becomes a presumed CBS credit, with a percentage by project, by month of use and by TIPI position.
What DFSpro changes: Approved project master data, base of eligible sales and current percentage linked to the sales document.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Carmakers with an approved project must calculate month by month the credit on domestic sales of the project's products, separating exempt, suspended, canceled and returned sales.
Legal basis, line by line
- LC 214/2025, arts. 309, 311 and 312: credit up to 31/12/2032, percentages by month of use, base of domestic sales and exclusion of exempt, suspended, canceled and returned sales
Proof delivered
Expected against obtained by sales document and by use band, with reconciliation of the credit calculated.
14Credits
Presumed credit of the automotive regime only offsets: no refund and no transfer
What weighs: The credit cannot be transferred between establishments or refunded in cash, and only offsets debits of the approved establishment.
What DFSpro changes: Balance control by approved establishment and allocation of its own debits.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Groups with several plants accumulate credit in the incentive plant and need to know how much can be used, against which debit and where.
Legal basis, line by line
- LC 214/2025, arts. 313 to 315: use only by offset, ban on transfer and refund, suspension and cancellation of approval with repayment
Proof delivered
Reconciliation of the balance by establishment with the tax calculation, and a scenario of approval cancellation with the repayment expected and obtained.
15Reform
Automotive regime IPI extended to 2026: the switch of the presumed credit
What weighs: The presumed IPI credit continues to 31/12/2026 under the 2025 rules, and CBS takes over afterward, with no gap and no overlap.
What DFSpro changes: Validity cut-off by project, with IPI calculated up to the date and CBS after it.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Approved projects live in 2026 with the IPI benefit and prepare for the CBS credit, with the same products in both calculations.
Legal basis, line by line
- LC 214/2025, art. 316, main text and § 2: extension to 31/12/2026, 2025 conditions kept and credit equal to the rates of art. 1 of Law 10,485 times 0.75
Proof delivered
Matrix of 2026 and 2027 documents with the benefit expected and obtained by project.
16ST
ICMS-ST on auto parts: Annex II, CEST on every invoice and the right MVA in the base withheld
What weighs: Every auto part item needs a CEST on the invoice, even without ST, and a wrong MVA becomes a difference flagged by data cross-checks.
What DFSpro changes: CEST and MVA master data by item and by destination state, with the non-application rule shown on the invoice.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Auto parts producers and distributors sell to many states, each with its own MVA, and the tax authority cross-checks NF-e, GIA and EFD.
Legal basis, line by line
- ICMS Agreement 142/2018, Annex II and clauses 20, 21 and 23: Annex II auto parts, CEST on every item, base and tax withheld on the invoice, obligations to the destination state and MVA by price survey
Proof delivered
Expected against obtained by item, state and CEST, and reconciliation of the NF-e with the GIA and the EFD.
17ST
Refund of ICMS-ST on auto parts: dedicated NF-e, authorization and limit of the amount withheld
What weighs: The refund depends on authorization from the tax authority and proof of the tax withheld, and the amount cannot exceed what was withheld on purchase.
What DFSpro changes: Report that links each interstate exit to the tax withheld on entry, item by item.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Distributors that resell parts already withheld in an interstate operation request the refund, and the states check the entries by automatic cross-checking.
Legal basis, line by line
- ICMS Agreement 142/2018, clauses 15 and 16: dedicated NF-e, authorization in 90 days, criterion of the latest purchases and limit of the amount withheld
Proof delivered
Reconciliation of the tax withheld on entry with the amount refunded, with a list of exceptions by item.
18Foreign trade
Suspension drawback for a parts supplier: the intermediate producer
What weighs: A company that supplies parts to another exporting industry can also use the regime, but needs approval and control of the grant act.
What DFSpro changes: Grant act balance linked to the import, the domestic purchase and the sale to the exporter.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Component suppliers sell to carmakers that export, and the imported input needs a trail to the final exported product.
Legal basis, line by line
- Law 11,945/2009, art. 12, main text, §§ 1 and 2: suspension on domestic purchase or import, approval by Secex and intermediate producer
- Decree 6,759/2009, arts. 383, 386 and 386-A: drawback as an export incentive, grant through Siscomex and intermediate producer
Proof delivered
Reconciliation between the grant act balance, entry and exit invoices and the write-off, with a list of differences.
19Reform
Selective Tax on vehicles: the master data the rate will require
What weighs: The rate will be graded by ten criteria of the vehicle, and SAP needs to hold these data in the master record before the ordinary law is issued.
What DFSpro changes: Vehicle attributes in the master data and a rule for a rate reduced to zero depending on the buyer.
See the situation, the legal basis and the proof
The situation
Carmakers and importers of vehicles listed in Annex XVII must place each model by power, efficiency, emissions and manufacturing steps in Brazil.
Legal basis, line by line
- LC 214/2025, arts. 419 and 420: rates in ordinary law, ten grading criteria and zero rate for a buyer recognized by the RFB
Proof delivered
Matrix of models with attributes, expected simulated rate and calculation obtained.